A nation that forgets its past is likely to repeat its errors. Memory is safeguarded as a cultural treasure in Brazil by Article 216 of the Federal Constitution, recognized as essential for enhancing government institutions.
A resolution was established designating May 10 as the Judiciary Memory Day to reflect on the history and evolution of our legal system, emphasizing its role in promoting justice and social progress.
Get ready to embark on a journey through this chapter of our past!
Day dedicated to honoring the historical milestones of the Judiciary’s power.
We will discuss some of the most significant cases in Brazilian history that have changed the understanding of socio-political dynamics.
The Constitution of 1988
The water divider event marked the start of modern democracy following a prolonged era of military rule.
The introduction of the new Constitution on 5 October 1988 signaled the creation of the Democratic State of Law in Brazil, enhancing the roots of democracy and citizenship.
The document was created by a National Constituent Assembly made up of representatives from different segments of society and engaged in lively discussions.
Advancements include ensuring personal freedoms, division of authority, equal treatment under the legal system, reforming the judiciary, granting federal status to municipalities, and safeguarding the environment.
Amnesty Law Ruling in 2010
In 2010, the Supreme Court upheld the legality of the Amnesty Act, which pardoned political offenses from the military rule era in Brazil (1964–1985), sparking discussions on national unity, remembrance, and transitional justice.
ADPF 54 was issued in 2012.
The legalization of abortion for anecdotal fetuses was approved by the Supreme Court in 2012 through the Arguição de Descarga de Preceito Fundamental (ADPF) 54, leading to discussions on bioethics and human rights, and enhancing the protection of women’s reproductive and individual rights.
English rights cases
The Supreme Court has ruled on various cases that have helped progress LGBTQIAP+ rights in Brazil, including legalizing same-sex civil unions and marriage, criminalizing homophobia and transphobia, and treating offenses against LGBT individuals as a form of racial discrimination.
These instances mark a notable advancement in safeguarding minority rights and advocating for equality under the law.
Evolution of the Judiciary over the years
The development of the Judiciary Branch over time is a complicated matter that includes alterations in its structure, societal role, and the approach to resolving legal matters.
We will delve further into each of these elements, along with the impact of technological advancements on the justice system.
Structure and function in the community
The Judiciary has experienced notable structural changes over the years, usually in reaction to social, political, and economic shifts.
- An increase in the quantity of courts and courtrooms to address the growing complexity of legal and population requirements.
- Access to justice is expanded through the establishment of specialized institutions and the introduction of legal aid services for marginalized communities.
However, the most notable change is observed in its function of safeguarding individual rights and advancing social justice.
The Judiciary is now more than just a conservative and passive entity focused on resolving disputes; it is actively working to protect fundamental rights as a guardian of the Constitution.
Judicial Methods
Judicial methods have changed over the years to reflect shifts in laws, court decisions, and legal practices, which are noticeable in:
- A shift from a strict and rule-focused legal system to a more adaptable system based on constitutional principles.
- An increased understanding of different ways to resolve conflicts, like mediation and conciliation, can help speed up legal proceedings and encourage a more cooperative and inclusive form of justice.
Impact of technological progress
The Judiciary Power Memorial Day is also connected to the future and technological progress and how it affects the delivery of justice.
The introduction of computer technology and electronic procedural systems in the courts hastened legal processes, leading to decreased time and expenses.
Today, we have the ability to use online platforms for legal purposes, such as tracking cases and having legal consultations from a distance. Additionally, there is a growing trend in using Big Data and predictive analysis to anticipate legal outcomes and inform policies in the legal sector.
It is crucial to guarantee the ethical and transparent use of these technologies, upholding rights and ensuring fairness and justice in legal judgments.
The fresh obstacles
In today’s circumstances, the Brazilian legal system encounters various obstacles that impact its effectiveness and capacity to administer justice efficiently. Some of these hurdles include:
- Procedure delays occur due to the high number of cases and the intricate nature of legal proceedings, leading to a delay in case resolution.
- Low-income individuals, rural communities, and indigenous peoples still encounter challenges in accessing the necessary legal services and representation, leading to barriers in obtaining justice.
- Brazilian society is experiencing fast and intricate transformations, leading to fresh concerns regarding human rights, environmental safeguarding, gender parity, and domestic abuse, among other subjects.
The Brazilian judiciary is working towards overcoming these challenges.
- Update technology;
- Establish programs for mediation and conciliation.
- Increase the availability of legal services.
The Brazilian Judiciary Branch is dedicated to discovering creative and efficient ways to guarantee access to justice and uphold the rule of law in the country, despite the remaining work to be done.
Memory constructs the future
Celebrating the Judiciary Memory Day involves reflecting on the past to influence future judicial practices.
Honoring our past can help us progress toward a future where everyone has access to justice and where the basic rights of each person are upheld.
Check out our article on Digital Law to stay updated on data protection laws if you enjoyed the content.