The Supreme Federal Court (STF) is reviewing the entire process of life review, which directly affects retirees and those insured by INSS.
The trial will be important in determining if beneficiaries can adjust their retirement benefits by taking into account all pension contributions, including those made before July 1994.
The choice could change the evaluation standards and impact the legal assurance of the pension processes.
This article provides a summary of the complete life review, the elements involved in a trial, and strategies for lawyers to support their clients within the existing legal framework. Take a look!
Learn how to protect the victim’s rights under the Maria da Penha Law.
Reviewing the history of one’s life.
The complete life review was authorized by the Supreme Court in 2022, permitting retired individuals to choose the most advantageous method for calculating their benefits.
The ruling acknowledged that individuals are allowed to factor in all their lifetime contributions when calculating retirement benefits, eliminating the transition provision from the 1999 Pension Reform.
The Supreme Court ruled in March 2024 that retirees cannot choose whether or not to follow the transition rule.
Contributions made before July 1994 will not be taken into account when calculating retirement benefits.
The Supreme Court’s shift in stance has had a significant impact on policyholders expecting a review of their entire life in the justice system, as well as on numerous ongoing legal cases.
Can you qualify for both Death and Retirement Pension?
STF will continue the life review trial in 2025.
Retirees who had their pensions calculated using only contributions made after July 1994 can request a review of their pension rights.
Insured individuals can now factor in their pre-date wages when calculating benefits, potentially leading to a higher value in many instances.
In December 2022, the STF ruled 6-5 in favor of allowing individuals to review their entire work history for recalculating retirement benefits.
New features introduced by the Union and the INSS brought the topic back for the Court’s consideration.
The Supreme Court revisited the ruling on February 14, 2025, regarding the review of lifetime pensions provided by the National Institute of Social Security (INSS).
Impact on attorneys and policyholders
The Supreme Court’s ruling directly impacts lawyers specializing in pension law, particularly those advocating for retirees seeking revisions prior to 2024.
Lawyers must adhere to the key points.
- The National Confederation of Metalworkers (CNTM) aims to guarantee that insured individuals can continue to request revisions beyond 21 March 2024.
- The Supreme Court could potentially decide that pensioners who have already received lifetime review payments do not have to repay the money.
- The INSS would face significant financial consequences if the life revision is approved, leading the government to oppose the idea due to the high cost involved.
Pension attorneys need to monitor the trial closely and develop plans to safeguard their clients’ interests.
How should attorneys proceed in this situation?
Lawyers can employ certain strategies to protect the rights of the insured due to the uncertainty surrounding life review processes.
- To assess the duration of contributions by policyholders and determine if including contributions before July 1994 would be advantageous for retirees.
- Keep an eye on the trial results in the Supreme Court as they could lead to new legal options or changes in the impact.
- Insured individuals who have already been paid revised values may have to return the amounts to the INSS if the comprehensive life review is eliminated.
Lawyers can strategically defend their clients by following judicial decisions and new legal principles.
Preparing for the upcoming assessment of life’s review.
The Supreme Court’s ruling on life expectancy revision in 2025 will play a crucial role in shaping the future of pension recalculation.
The Court’s shift in perspective in 2024 has created uncertainty for many policyholders, and the recent ruling could have a direct effect on those who initiated legal proceedings prior to that year.
It is crucial for attorneys to monitor the case and advise clients on the most effective strategies for each scenario.
Keep track of trial deployments and get ready for potential new initiatives and resources if you’re in the social security field. Also, check out our piece on Legal Repository AI for managing legal documents.